Lauren Moshi LLC v. Daniel Fuentes

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:18-cv-06725California820 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 18-6725-DMG (JPRx) Date January 16, 2020

Title Lauren Moshi, LLC v. Daniel Fuentes Page 1 of 2

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS -- ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW

AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT / COUNTER-PLAINTIFF AND ORDER

TO SHOW CAUSE WHY GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO MODIFY

SCHEDULING ORDER AND WHY THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION [69]

I. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

On January 10, 2020, Mikhael Bortz, of Bortz Law Firm, P.A., admitted pro hac vice, filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for Defendant / Counterclaimant Daniel Fuentes on the ground that health issues have impaired her ability to provide Defendant with adequate representation. [Doc. # 69.]

“A motion for leave to withdraw must be made upon written notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.