Lauren Moshi LLC v. Daniel Fuentes
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20202:18-cv-06725California820 words
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 18-6725-DMG (JPRx) Date January 16, 2020
Title Lauren Moshi, LLC v. Daniel Fuentes Page 1 of 2
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS -- ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW
AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT / COUNTER-PLAINTIFF AND ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE WHY GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER AND WHY THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION [69]
I. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
On January 10, 2020, Mikhael Bortz, of Bortz Law Firm, P.A., admitted pro hac vice, filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for Defendant / Counterclaimant Daniel Fuentes on the ground that health issues have impaired her ability to provide Defendant with adequate representation. [Doc. # 69.]
“A motion for leave to withdraw must be made upon written notice…