Pedro Hernandez v. Synchrony Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20202:18-cv-09139California419 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 18-9139 FMO (PLAx) Date January 21, 2020 Title Pedro Hernandez v. Synchrony Bank, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Filing Third Amended Complaint Pursuant to the Court’s Order of December 30, 2019, (Dkt. 52), the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, and plaintiff was “granted until January 9, 2020, to file a Third Amended Complaint[.]” (See id. at 2). Plaintiff was “cautioned that failure to timely file a Third Amended Complaint may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order.” (See id.). As of the filing date of this Order, a Third Amended Complaint has not been filed. (See, generally, Dkt.). Nor has plaintiff filed a notice that he intends to stand on his most…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.