Arthur Lopez v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20208:19-cv-01816California3,565 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:19-cv-01816-JFW-KESx Date: January 17, 2020

Title: ARTHUR LOPEZ v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., et al.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Why Arthur Lopez Should Not Be Declared a Vexatious Litigant

I. LEGAL STANDARD

The All Writs Act, coupled with federal courts “inherent power” to “regulate the activities of abusive litigants,” authorizes district courts to enter pre-filing orders limiting the right of vexatious litigants to file legal actions. De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1147 (9th Cir. 1990). Thus, this authority exists independently of the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction to decide the merits of the underlying claims. See id. at 1146-47; see also Peabody v. United States, 263 F. App’x 560 (9th Cir. 2008) (affirming vexatious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.