Pamela Day v. Dustin Boyer
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
JS-6
2
3 4
5
6
7 United States District Court 8 9 Central District of California 10 PAMELA DAY, Case No. 2:19-cv-01669-ODW (RAOx) 11 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
12 v.
RENEWED MOTION FOR
13 DUSTIN BOYER, DEFAULT JUDGMENT [20] 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Pamela Day moves for entry of default judgment against Defendant 19 Dustin Boyer (“Motion”). (Renewed Mot. for Default J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 20.) For 20 the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion.1 21 II. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff Pamela Day initiated this action against Defendant Dustin Boyer on 23 March 7, 2019. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Day asserts a dozen claims against Boyer for 24 violations of federal securities law and state law related to a cryptocurrency investment 25 she made with Boyer in December 2017. (See Compl. ¶¶ 3–10.) Day alleges that 26 Boyer represented to her that Day could purchase an allocation of MobileCoin’s initial 27
28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in support of…