Neal Allen Panschow v. Juan Murillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20205:19-cv-02446California2,043 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 NEAL ALLEN PANSCHOW, Case No. 5:19-cv-02446-DSF-AFM 13 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. 14 FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

15 JUAN MURILLO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff,a federal prisoner who is presently being heldat the Portland,Oregon 19 Halfway House, filed this pro se civil rights action on December 19, 2019, and he 20 appears to wish to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Plaintiff neither paid the 21 required filing fee nor filed a Request to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff has been ordered to 22 either pay the full filing fee or request to proceed IFP, but plaintiff has taken neither 23 action to date. In the Complaint, plaintiff names as defendants Federal Bureau of 24 Prisons (“BOP”) Guard Murillo and BOP Correctional Counselor Gaston. (ECF No. 25 1 at 3.) Plaintiff’s claims arise from an incident that allegedly occurred while plaintiff 26 was being held at the Federal Correctional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.