Neal Allen Panschow v. Juan Murillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20205:19-cv-02446California2,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 11 NEAL ALLEN PANSCHOW, Case No. 5:19-cv-02446-DSF-AFM Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

JUAN MURILLO, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff,a federal prisoner who is presently being heldat the Portland,Oregon Halfway House, filed this pro se civil rights action on December 19, 2019, and he appears to wish to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Plaintiff neither paid the required filing fee nor filed a Request to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff has been ordered to either pay the full filing fee or request to proceed IFP, but plaintiff has taken neither action to date. In the Complaint, plaintiff names as defendants Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) Guard Murillo and BOP Correctional Counselor Gaston. (ECF No. 1 at 3.) Plaintiff’s claims arise from an incident that allegedly occurred while plaintiff was being held at the Federal Correctional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.