Lovada Workman v. Dearborn National Life Insurance Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 LOVADA WORKMAN, Case No. 2:17-cv-04515-ODW (SSx) 12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
13 v.
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
14 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE JUDGMENT AND DENYING 15 INSURANCE CO., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [31][32] 16
17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Lovada Workman (“Workman”), brings this action against Defendant 20 Dearborn National Life Insurance Co. (“Dearborn”) to recover the interest Dearborn 21 earned on the life insurance proceeds and disgorgement of any profits Dearborn may 22 have realized by the wrongful retention of such benefits. (See generally First Am. 23 Compl. (“FAC”) 8, ECF No. 12.) Workman alleges claims against Dearborn for: (1) 24 Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Equitable Relief under the Employee Retirement 25 Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. section 1132(a); and (2) Unjust 26 Enrichment. (FAC ¶¶ 9–31.) 27 Pending before the Court are the Parties’ cross Motions for Summary Judgment 28 to determine…