Jenna Noble v. Dorcy Inc.

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 JENNA NOBLE, Case No. 2:19-cv-08646-ODW (JPRx) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND 14 DORCY INC. et al. DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANTS’ 15 Defendants. MOTION TO DISMISS [10] 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Defendants Dorcy Inc. and Dorcy Pruter (collectively, “Defendants”) move to 20 dismiss certain claims in Plaintiff Jenna Noble (“Noble”)’s Complaint alleging 21 sexually harassing conduct during her employment. (See generally Mot. to Dismiss 22 (“Mot.”), ECF No. 10.) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART, 23 AND DENIES IN PART, Defendants’ Motion.1 24 25 26 27

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 1 II. BACKGROUND 2 Around April or May of 2018, Noble, a resident of Alberta, Canada, began her 3 position as an enrollment manager with…