Landon Ryan Johnson v. R. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20205:19-cv-00418California834 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 LANDON RYAN JOHNSON, ) N O . E D C V 1 9 - 4 1 8 - J L S ( K S ) 11 Petitioner, ) 12 ) v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) 13 ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED 14 R. JOHNSON, Warden, ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) 15 Respondent. ) 16 _________________________________ )

17 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas 20 Corpus, all the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States 21 Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 22 portions of the Report to which Petitioner has raised objections (“Objections”). Pertinent 23 Objections are addressed below. Petitioner’s Objections are overruled. 24 25 First, Petitioner objects that the Report quotes the California Court of Appeal’s 26 inaccurate summary of the evidence from his trial for …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.