Angela Deemer v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20208:19-cv-00483California3,335 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3 O 4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ANGELA D., Case No. 8:19-cv-00483-KES

12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

13 v.

ORDER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 16

17

18 I.

19 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

20 In November 2014, Plaintiff Angela D. (“Plaintiff”) applied for disability 21 benefits under Titles II and XVI alleging a disability onset date of January 27, 22 2014. Administrative Record (“AR”) 230-42. 23 On September 5, 2017, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) conducted a 24 hearing at which Plaintiff, who was represented by an attorney, appeared and 25 testified, as did a vocational expert and a medical expert. AR 101-19. On October 26

27 1 Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 28 1 18, 2017, the ALJ issued an unfavorable decision. AR 19-37. 2 The ALJ found that Plaintiff suffered medically determinable severe 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.