Carl Jamal Christian v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20202:18-cv-05792California1,721 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

WESTERN DIVISION

10 CARL JAMAL CHRISTIAN, ) Case No: 2:18-cv-05792-CJC (JDE) 11 ) Plaintiff, ) 12 ) PROTECTIVE ORDER RE RECORDS v. ) COMPILED BY THE COUNTY OF 13 ) LOS ANGELES SHERIFFS ) DEPARTMENT 14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., ) ) 15 ) Defendants. ) 16

17 Based upon the showing by Defendants (Dkt. 69, 69-1, 69-2), and good cause 18 appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY FOUND AND ORDERED that: 19 The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (“LASD”) is producing, pursuant 20 to Court Order (Dkt. 72), documents considered confidential by LASD, under Federal 21 and California State Law. LASD further contends that the documents are further 22 produced pursuant to the privacy considerations recognized by federal courts. See Kelly 23 v. City of San Jose, 114 F.R.D. 653, 656 (N.D. Cal. 1987; Miller v. Pancucci, 141 F.R.D. 24 292, 300 (C.D. Cal. 1992). These documents shall hereinafter be …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.