VBGO 5550 Hollywood LLC v. Jules Charleston

1 2 3 4 5 6 JS-6 7 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 VBGO 5550 Hollywood LLC, CASE NUMBER: 10 11 CV 20-0671-ODW (KSx) Plaintiff 12 V. 13 |} Jules Charleston,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

14 STATE COURT 1 Defendant(s). 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 |County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 |/court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 || Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 |! removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of 24 |! Am. Corp., 672 F.3d…