Maria Guzman v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20205:19-cv-00291California3,397 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 O 3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MARIA G., Case No. 5:19-cv-00291-KES

12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

13 v.

ORDER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 16

17

18 I.

19 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

20 In November 2014, Plaintiff Maria G. (“Plaintiff”) applied for Title II 21 disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) alleging a disability onset date of September 22 20, 1999. Administrative Record (“AR”) 153-56.2 23 1 Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is 24 automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 25 2 Plaintiff submitted an earlier application and was found “not disabled” in 26 an ALJ decision dated December 9, 2005. AR 16. The Social Security 27 Administration (“SSA”) was unable to locate a copy of the 2005 decision, so the ALJ considered Plaintiff’s application de novo. Id. 28 1 On October 2, 2017, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) conducted a 2 hearing at which Plaintiff, who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.