Edward Tyrone Malone v. August Privratsky

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20202:19-cv-10796California2,716 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 ) EDWARD TYRONE MALONE, ) Case No. CV19-10796-JAK (JEM) 12 ) Plaintiff, ) 13 ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. ) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH 14 ) LEAVE TO AMEND

AUGUST PRIVRATSKY, )

15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 On December 20, 2019, Edward Tyrone Malone (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner 18 proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 19 (“Complaint”). 20

SCREENING STANDARDS

21 In accordance with the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the 22 Court must screen the Complaint before ordering service to determine whether the action: 23 (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (3) 24 seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1915A(b); 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1). This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.