Pedro Rodriguez v. Neil McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20205:18-cv-00400California703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, ) NO. EDCV 18-400-AG (AGR) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NEIL McDOWELL, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ) 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), the Objections and Defendant’s reply. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff objects that his claim for injunctive relief is not moot simply because he has been transferred to another prison. The case he cites, however, holds that a prison transfer moots a claim for injunctive relief unless a prisoner establishes a reasonable expectation or a demonstrated probability that he will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.