John Alexander Riccardi v. Jerome Price

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20202:16-cv-07806California1,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 11 JOHN ALEXANDER RICCARDI, ) No. CV 16-7806-AG (PLA) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) JEROME PRICE, Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) ) 17 On September 17, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”), recommending that petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Docket No. 59). On October 3, 2019, respondent filed Objections to the Report. (Docket No. 60). On December 13, 2019, petitioner filed Objections to the Report. (Docket No. 65). The Magistrate Judge’s Report adequately addresses the issues raised in respondent’s Objections and most of the issues raised in petitioner’s Objections. A few of the issues in petitioner’s Objections, however, warrant further discussion. For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.