John Alexander Riccardi v. Jerome Price
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 JOHN ALEXANDER RICCARDI, ) No. CV 16-7806-AG (PLA) ) 13 Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION 14 v. ) OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) 15 JEROME PRICE, Warden, ) ) 16 Respondent. ) ) 17 18 On September 17, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 19 Recommendation (“Report”), recommending that petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 20 be denied and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Docket No. 59). On October 3, 2019, 21 respondent filed Objections to the Report. (Docket No. 60). On December 13, 2019, petitioner 22 filed Objections to the Report. (Docket No. 65). 23 The Magistrate Judge’s Report adequately addresses the issues raised in respondent’s 24 Objections and most of the issues raised in petitioner’s Objections. A few of the issues in 25 petitioner’s Objections, however, warrant further discussion. For…