Christopher Piazza v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20202:18-cv-06484California3,246 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER P. ) Case No. CV 18-6484-SP ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER 14 ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) 15 Social Security Administration, ) ) 16 Defendant. ) ) 17 ) 18 19 I. 20 INTRODUCTION 21 On July 27, 2018, plaintiff Christopher P. filed a complaint against 22 defendant, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration 23 (“Commissioner”), seeking a review of a denial of a period of disability and 24 disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). The parties have fully briefed the matters in 25 dispute, and the court deems the matter suitable for adjudication without oral 26 argument. 27 Plaintiff presents two disputed issues for decision: (1) whether the 28 1 Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) posed a complete hypothetical to the vocational 2 expert; and (2) whether the ALJ properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.