Kaizen Advisors, LLC v. AO Eyewear, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20202:19-cv-01388California179 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

JS-6

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 KAIZEN ADVISORS, LLC, a Nevada Case No. 2:19-cv-01388 FMO (SKx) limited liability company, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER ON STIPULATION [54] OF v. DISMISSAL 14 AO EYEWEAR, INC., a Delaware 15 corporation; ALAN MCKINLEY, an individual; EUROPA EYE WEAR 16 CORP., an Illinois corporation, doing business as EUROPA 17 INTERNATIONAL, CINZIA, and STATE OPTICAL CO.; and DOES 1- 18 20, inclusive,

19 Defendants.

20 21 Having reviewed the Stipulation by Plaintiff Kaizen Advisors, LLC and 22 Defendants AO Eyewear, Inc., Alan McKinley, and Europa Eyewear Corp. dba 23 Europa International, Cinzia, and State Optical Co. (collectively, the “Parties”), it is 24 hereby ORDERED that the action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The court will 25 not retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. 26 Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 1677 (1994). 27 Dated: February 3, 2020 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.