Frankie Mary Ann Phillips v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20205:19-cv-01430California3,791 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANKIE M. A. P., ) NO. ED CV 19-1430-E ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of ) AND ORDER OF REMAND Social Security, ) 15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ____________________________________) 17 18 Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), IT IS 19 HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for summary 20 judgment are denied, and this matter is remanded for further 21 administrative action consistent with this Opinion. 22 23 PROCEEDINGS 24 25 Plaintiff filed a complaint on August 1, 2019, seeking review of 26 the Commissioner’s denial of benefits. The parties consented to 27 proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge on September 16, 2019. 28 Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on December 17, 2019. 1 Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on January 16, 2020. 2 The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.