Christopher Von Schlobohm v. County of Los Angeles

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER VON SCHLOBOHM, Case No. 2:19-07358 DOC (ADS) i 12 Plaintiff, c 13 v. a ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR r FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., d Defendants. 15 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Christopher Von Schlobohm (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a 20 Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 23, 2019. [Dkt. No. 1]. Over the next 21 several months, Plaintiff filed multiple proofs of service and requests for default 22 judgment. [Dkt. Nos. 20, 23, 25, 27, 31, 42]. Plaintiff received multiple notices of 23 deficiency from the court for failure to comply with service requirements and provide 24 adequate proofs of service. [Dkt. Nos. 22, 29, 34, 48]. 1 The only defendants that have acknowledged service and appeared in this action 2 were dismissed without leave to amend pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 3 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [Dkt. No. 44]. On January 15, 2020, the Court issued an Order to 4 Show Cause Why Case Should Not…