Victor Arzate v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:20-cv-01076California998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION VICTOR ARZATE, ) Case No. 2:20-cv-01076-DOC (JDE) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: v. ) DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting ) STATE A CLAIM ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) 15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 On February 3, 2020, Plaintiff Victor Arzate, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint seeking review of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 1, 3. In cases in which a plaintiff is proceeding IFP, the Court has an obligation to dismiss any such case “at any time if the court determines that . . . (B) the action . . . (ii) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). “A district court may deny leave to proceed [IFP] at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.” Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.