Hoffman

Hoffman v. Screen Actors Guild Producers Pension Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:16-cv-01530California217 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 LESLIE HOFFMAN, Case No.: 2:16-CV-01530-CJC-E

12 Plaintiff, Hon. Judge Cormac J. Carney

13 v. JUDGMENT

14 SCREEN ACTORS GUILD- PRODUCERS PENSION PLAN, an 15 ERISA plan; BOARD OF TRUSTEES

SCREEN ACTORS GUILD-

16 PRODUCERS PENSION PLAN, a plan administrator; DOES 1 through 10, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 2 Plaintiff Leslie Hoffman (‘Plaintiff’) is hereby awarded judgment on her claims 3 ||for relief against Defendants Screen Actors Guild — Producers’ Pension Plan (the 4 |\“Plan’) and Board of Trustees (collectively “Defendants”), as follows: 5 1. This matter is remanded back to Defendants for a further review of their 6 ||termination of Plaintiff's benefits. 7 2. Defendants shall pay Plaintiff $54,516.67 in allegedly past-due benefits, g ||pursuant to Pannebecker v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston, 542 F. 3d 1213 (9 9 2008). 10 3. Any motion for attorneys’ fees shall be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.