Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Kristina Trujillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:18-cv-09577California1,093 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case № 2:18-CV-09577-ODW (JPRx)

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff-in-Interpleader, ORDER DENYING MICHELE 13 v. TRUJILLO’S MOTION FOR 14 SUMMARY JUDGMENT [59]

KRISTINA TRUJILLO, ALEC

15 TRUJILLO, TERA TRUJILLO, and

MICHELE TRUJILLO,

16

17 Defendants-in-Interpleader. 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Before the Court is Defendant-in-Interpleader Michele Trujillo’s Motion for 20 Summary Judgment (“Motion”). (Mot. for Summ. J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 59.) The 21 Motion is fully briefed. (See Opp’n to Mot. (“Opp’n”), ECF No. 63; Reply in Supp. 22 of Mot. (“Reply”), ECF No. 65.) Having carefully considered the papers filed in 23 connection with the Motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision 24 without oral argument. Fed R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For the reasons 25 discussed below, the Court DENIES the Motion. (ECF No. 59.) 26 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 27 Plaintiff-in Interpleader …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.