Demario Jones v. Federal Express Corporation

Js 2 4 5 6 7 Ginited States District Court ° Central District of California 10 11 | DEMARIO JONES, Case No. 2:19-cv-08429 ODW(JCx) 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

1S v. REMAND AND DENYING AS 14 | FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, | MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS [22] 15 || et al.; 25] 16 Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Demario Jones seeks to remand this action to Los Angeles Cour 19 || Superior Court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Mot. to Remand (“Mot.’ 20 || ECF No. 22.) Jones argues that Defendants Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx’ 21]; FedEx Corporate Services; Michael Caron (“Caron”) (erroneously named (“Micha 22 || Carona”)); and Sandra Garcia Mead (“Garcia Mead”) (collectively, (“Defendants’ 23 || failed to establish diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because Caron ai 24 || Garcia Mead destroy complete diversity. For the reasons discussed below, the Cot 25 || GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (“Motion”)…