Wylmina Hettinga v. Eddie Garcia
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 WYLMINA HETTINGA, ) Case No. CV 20-0430-PA (JPR) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 13 v. ) ) 14 EDDIE GARCIA et al. ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 17 On January 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed pro se a civil-rights 18 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, paying the filing fee. She 19 sues a Santa Clara County superior-court judge, the San Jose 20 police chief, the chief justice of the California Supreme Court, 21 the County of Santa Clara, a clerk of that county’s superior 22 court, and her daughter, Theresa Loumena. (Compl. at 4-8.) Only 23 the last-named Defendant resides in this District (see id. at 6 24 ¶ 8), and all of the events alleged in the Complaint took place 25 outside this District (see generally id. at 9-37). The claims 26 relate to Plaintiff’s myriad divorce and custody proceedings in 27 Santa Clara County. This is not her first complaint in this 28 District stemming from those proceedings, however. See, e.g., 1 1 Max Loumena et al. v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye et al., No. CV 16-2032- 2 PA (JPR) (C.D. Cal. filed Mar. 24, 2016). She has been…