801 Properties LP v. Luis Urioste
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
FEB 12 2020
2 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 py: Vor sDEPUTY 5 6 JS-6 7 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
? | 801 PROPERTIES LP, GAS KuBrR: 10 ll CV 20-1175-FMO (AGRx) Plaintiff 12 v. 13 || LUIS URIOSTE, et al.,
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
14 STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced ina state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress,” 21 || Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276,…