801 Properties LP v. Luis Urioste

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20202:20-cv-01175California1,208 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FEB 2020

2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA py: Vor sDEPUTY 5 JS-6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

? 801 PROPERTIES LP, GAS KuBrR: 10 ll CV 20-1175-FMO (AGRx) Plaintiff v. 13 || LUIS URIOSTE, et al.,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced ina state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress,” 21 || Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.