Warden

Jose A. Jimenez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20208:19-cv-01321California1,175 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. SA CV 19-1321 CJC (MRW) 13 JOSE JIMENEZ,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

14 Petitioner,

WITH PREJUDICE

15 v. 16 STEPHEN PFEIFFER, Warden, 17 Respondent. 18

19 The Court grants the California Attorney General’s motion to dismiss 20 this untimely habeas corpus action. 28 U.S.C. § 2244. 21 * * * 22 1. Petitioner was convicted of multiple counts of attempted 23 murder and gang-related offenses in the early 2000s. His conviction 24 became final when the state supreme court denied review in mid-2004. He 25 is currently serving a life term in prison. 26 2. In 2019, Petitioner filed this habeas action in federal court. 27 (Docket # 1.) The petition contained (a) a challenge to the sufficiency of the 28 1 evidence at his original trial, and (b) a claim of prosecutorial misconduct. 2 (Docket # 8-1 at 2.) 3 3. Magistrate Judge Wilner issued a screening order. (Docket 4 # 4.) The order noted several facial problems with the petition, notably 5 untimeliness under AEDPA and a lack of exhaustion of the claims. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.