Roberto Saucedo Perez v. City of Santa Ana

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20208:19-cv-00265California1,246 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERTO SAUCEDO PEREZ, Case No. 8:19-cv-00265-FMO-SHK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

14 CITY OF SANTA ANA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 On February 11, 2019, Plaintiff Roberto Saucedo Perez (“Plaintiff”) filed a 19 Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Santa Ana. Electronic Case 20 Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Complaint. On May 14, 2019—two days after his 21 90-day deadline to serve the Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22 4(m)—Plaintiff filed a Request for Extension (“Request”) of time to serve the 23 Summons and Complaint and to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF 24 No. 5, Request. Plaintiff stated that the extension was necessary because of 25 “Plaintiff’s inability to ascertain the identities of more than (10) ‘Jon Doe’ officers 26 involved in this civil rights action.” Id. Plaintiff requested an additional ninety 27 days to serve and file these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.