Roberto Saucedo Perez v. City of Santa Ana

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20208:19-cv-00265California1,246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERTO SAUCEDO PEREZ, Case No. 8:19-cv-00265-FMO-SHK Plaintiff, v.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

CITY OF SANTA ANA, Defendant. 16 I. BACKGROUND On February 11, 2019, Plaintiff Roberto Saucedo Perez (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Santa Ana. Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Complaint. On May 14, 2019—two days after his 90-day deadline to serve the Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m)—Plaintiff filed a Request for Extension (“Request”) of time to serve the Summons and Complaint and to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 5, Request. Plaintiff stated that the extension was necessary because of “Plaintiff’s inability to ascertain the identities of more than (10) ‘Jon Doe’ officers involved in this civil rights action.” Id. Plaintiff requested an additional ninety days to serve and file these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.