Pedro Hernandez v. Synchrony Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20202:18-cv-09139California1,006 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 18-9139 FMO (PLAx) Date February 18, 2020 Title Pedro Hernandez v. Synchrony Bank, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution On December 30, 2019, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) based on plaintiff’s failure to oppose defendant’s motion. (See Dkt. 52, Court’s Order of December 30, 2019). The court dismissed the SAC with leave to amend, (see id. at 2), and ordered plaintiff to file a third amended complaint (“TAC”) no later than January 9, 2020. (See id.). Plaintiff was admonished that failure to timely file an amended complaint could result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order. (See id.) (citing Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.