Daniel Gonzalez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20205:18-cv-02224California2,953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL G., Case No. 5:18-02224-GJS

Plaintiff

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Daniel G. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). [Dkt. 1.] The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11 & 12] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 22 (“Pl.’s Br.”), Dkt. 23 (“Def.’s Br.”) & Dkt. 24 (“Pl. Rep.”)]. The Court has

In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. 27 Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of Social Security, is substituted as 28 defendant for Nancy A. Berryhill.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.