Daniel Gonzalez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20205:18-cv-02224California2,953 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 DANIEL G.,1 Case No. 5:18-02224-GJS

12 Plaintiff

13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant. 16

17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 18 Plaintiff Daniel G. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the 19 decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his applications for 20 Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). 21 [Dkt. 1.] The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States 22 Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11 & 12] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case 23 [Dkt. 22 (“Pl.’s Br.”), Dkt. 23 (“Def.’s Br.”) & Dkt. 24 (“Pl. Rep.”)]. The Court has 24

25

26 1 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. 27 2 Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of Social Security, is substituted as 28 defendant for Nancy A. Berryhill.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.