James Zarian v. Steven Legere

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20208:17-cv-02245California924 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 DENIED JS-6

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

2

3 Defendants again fail to submit a proper proposed judgment. This 4 filing, too, resembles a proposed order on a motion for summary judgment, except that, this time, Defendants copied language from 5 the Court’s order on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judg- ment. Defendants are expected to understand how to prepare a pro- 6 posed judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. 7 Additionally, the Court VACATES the February 28, 2020 Final Pre- trial Conference. 8 Date: 02/19/2020 Judge Josephine L. Staton 9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 (Southern Division - Santa Ana) 11

12 13

14

15 CASE NO.: 8:17-cv-02245-JLS-PLA 16 James Zarian Plaintiff

THE HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L.

17 vs. STATON 18 Steven Legere; Kim Legere; [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON 19 Raul Valle; MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDG- 20 MENT 21 Hearing Date: 1/24/2020 22 Time 10:30 AM 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.