Carson Cogeneration Company v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20202:19-cv-10797California1,911 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-10797 PA (JEMx) Date February 18, 2020 Title Carson Cogeneration Company v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE T. Jackson Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER Before the Court is a Motion to Remand filed by plaintiff Carson Cogeneration Company (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. 15 (“Mot.”).) Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Defendant”) filed an Opposition and Plaintiff filed a Reply. (Dkts. 19 (“Opp.”) and 22.) The Court finds this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for February 24, 2020, is vacated and the matter taken off calendar. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies the Motion to Remand. 1. BACKGROUND This is an insurance coverage…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.