Walter Bolden v. Rick Hill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 20-01137 MWF (PVC) Date: February 20, 2020 Title Walter Bolden v. Rick Hill, Warden
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioners: Attorneys Present for Respondents: None None
PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT
THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY
On January 27, 2020,1 Walter Bolden (“Petitioner”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the “Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner asserts four claims: (1) that he was denied his sixth amendment right to appellate counsel when his lawyer abandoned him after his appeal to the California Court of Appeal, (2) that he was denied his sixth amendment right to a jury comprised of a cross section of the community, (3) that evidence of gang membership should not have been allowed at trial, and (4) that possession of gun evidence violates code…