Walter Bolden v. Rick Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20202:20-cv-01137-MWF-PVCCalifornia2,325 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-01137 MWF (PVC) Date: February 20, 2020 Title Walter Bolden v. Rick Hill, Warden

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioners: Attorneys Present for Respondents: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY

On January 27, 2020,1 Walter Bolden (“Petitioner”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the “Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner asserts four claims: (1) that he was denied his sixth amendment right to appellate counsel when his lawyer abandoned him after his appeal to the California Court of Appeal, (2) that he was denied his sixth amendment right to a jury comprised of a cross section of the community, (3) that evidence of gang membership should not have been allowed at trial, and (4) that possession of gun evidence violates code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.