Rodrigo Andrade v. S. Frauenheim

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 RODRIGO ANDRADE, ) Case No. 8:18-cv-00959-JAK-JC 11 ) Petitioner, ) 12 ) v. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, 13 ) CONCLUSIONS, AND

S. FRAUENHEIM, ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF

14 ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE Respondent. ) JUDGE 15 ) _______________________________ ) 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”), the parties’ submissions 19 in connection with petitioner’s Motion for Stay and Abeyance (“Stay Motion”), 20 and all of the records herein, including the November 1, 2019 Report and 21 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and 22 Recommendation”), and petitioner’s objections thereto filed on February 13, 2020 23 (“Objections”). 24 The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report 25 and Recommendation to which objection is…