Rodrigo Andrade v. S. Frauenheim
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 RODRIGO ANDRADE, ) Case No. 8:18-cv-00959-JAK-JC ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) CONCLUSIONS, AND
S. FRAUENHEIM, ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF
) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE Respondent. ) JUDGE ) _______________________________ ) 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”), the parties’ submissions in connection with petitioner’s Motion for Stay and Abeyance (“Stay Motion”), and all of the records herein, including the November 1, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), and petitioner’s objections thereto filed on February 13, 2020 (“Objections”). The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is…