Joseph Carrington v. Robert Neuschmid

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH CARRINGTON, Case No. 2:19-cv-02771-FMO-MAA

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“R&R,” ECF No. 25). The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, which were filed on February 4, 2020. (“Objection,” ECF No. 26.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the R&R to which Petitioner specifically has objected. /// /// /// I. ALLEGED PROCEDURAL DEFICIENCIES In the Objection, Petitioner asserts that the Court’s handling of Petitioner’s stay request was “unconstitutional and prejudicial.” (Objection at 2 (emphasis removed).) This Court…