Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. B L Blackwell

1 2 3 4

JS-6

5 6 7 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 Wells Fargo Bank, NA, CASE NUMBER: 10 11 CV 20-01512-MWFE (ASx) Plaintiff 12 v. 13 || B.L. Blackwell, Gladys M. Copeland, Jorne Lizana. and Ann Lizana ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 14 STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 | court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great Northern R. Co. 22 Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, 23 those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v.…