Michael Terpin v. AT and T Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 MICHAEL TERPIN, Case No. 2:18-cv-06975-ODW (KSx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND
v.
DENYING, IN PART,
14 AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, et al., DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [33] Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Michael 19 Terpin’s (“Terpin”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (the “Motion”). (Mot., ECF 20 No. 33.) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS, IN PART, AND DENIES, 21 IN PART, AT&T’s Motion.1 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND As previously set forth in the Court’s July 19, 2019 Order (“July Order”), (ECF 24 No. 29), granting in part and denying in part AT&T’s motion to dismiss the original 25 Complaint, Mr. Terpin is a prominent and well-known member of the cryptocurrency 26 community. (FAC ¶¶ 18–19, ECF No. 32.) He is domiciled in Puerto Rico with a
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the…