James Rutherford v. JJS Market and Liquor
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2
3 4
5
6
7
8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California
10 11 JAMES RUTHERFORD, Case No. 5:18-cv-02656-ODW (SHKx) 12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
13 v.
MOTION FOR DEFAULT
14 JJ’S MARKET AND LIQUOR; et al., JUDGMENT [45] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff James Rutherford (“Rutherford”) moves for an entry of default judgment 20 against Talat Radwan and Natasha Radwan, owners of the property in question, and JJ’s 21 Market and Liquor, a retail establishment (collectively, “Defendants”). (Mot. for 22 Default J. (“Mot.”) 1, ECF No. 45-2.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court 23 GRANTS Rutherford’s Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion”).1 24 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 25 On December 26, 2018, Rutherford initiated this action against Defendants. 26 (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 1, ECF No. 17.) There are two claims that arise from 27
28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for…