Jeffrey Geddes v. Cynthia M. Herrea

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20208:20-cv-00349California1,241 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

BACKGROUND

21 22 On February 20, 2020, Jeffrey Geddes (“Petitioner”), a 23 California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a “Petition for 24 Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Docket Entry No. 1), which the Court 25 construes as a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody 26 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). (Docket Entry No. 1). 27 Petitioner challenges his 2017 conviction for carjacking (pursuant 28 1 to a plea agreement) and resulting 3-year sentence in the Orange 2 County Superior Court (Case No. 17WF1049). While the Petition 3 alleges ineffectiveness by the prosecutors in relation to the 4 withdrawal of the plea, the claim is incomprehensible. (See 5 Petition at 2).1 6 7 On September 30, 2019, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ 8 of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 9 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the same conviction.2 See Jeffrey 10 Geddes v. Orange Copunty Judge Michael Murray, Case No. SACV 19- 11 01871-JFW (AS); Docket Entry No. 1 (“the prior habeas action”). 12 On January 31, 2020, the district court issued an Order and 13 Judgment denying that habeas petition with prejudice (based on 14 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.