Kim D. Walker, Jr. v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20202:19-cv-01689California3,911 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIM D. W.1 Case No. 2:19-cv-01689-AFM 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND 13 ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF v.

COMMISSIONER

14 ANDREW SAUL,2 Commissioner of 15 Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff filed this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision 18 denying his application for supplemental security income benefits. In accordance 19 with the Court’s case management order, the parties have filed briefs addressing the 20 merits of the disputed issues. This matter is now ready for decision. 21 /// 22 /// 23 24 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 26 27 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is substituted as the proper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.