Iscra Jaramillo v. Daniel Ott

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20205:20-cv-00330California949 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 20-330 PA (KKx) Date February 24, 2020 Title Iscra Jaramillo v. Daniel Ott, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE T. Jackson None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by defendant Daniel Ott (“Removing Defendant’). Removing Defendant asserts that this Court has jurisdiction over the action brought against him and co-defendant Siegel Land & Livestock, LLC by plaintiff Iscra Jaramillo (“Plaintiff”) based on the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over those matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See, e.g., Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S. Ct.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.