Tiffni Altes v. Bulletproof 360, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 TIFFNI ALTES, Case No. 2:19-cv-04409-ODW (SKx) 12 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
13 v.
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
14 BULLETPROOF 360, INC., INJUNCTION [31] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Tiffni Altes (“Altes”) files a motion for preliminary injunction against 20 Defendant Bulletproof 360, Inc. (“Bulletproof”) for the sake of public health and the 21 right to a marketplace free of unfair competition. (See generally Mot. for Preliminary 22 Injunction (“Mot.”), ECF No. 31.) For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES 23 Altes’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”).1 24 25 26 27
28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 1 II. BACKGROUND 2 Defendant Bulletproof manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells Bulletproof 3 Cold Brew Coffee (“Coffee Product”). (First Am. Compl.…