Fariba Kermanshahi v. Michael Jame Addineh
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JS-6 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FARIBA KERMANSHAHI, Case No. CV 20-01466 FMO (RAOx) 12 Petitioner,
13 v. ORDER REMANDING ACTION
AND DENYING REQUEST TO
14 MICHAEL JAME ADDINEH, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 15 Respondent. 16 17 I. 18
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
19 Petitioner Fariba Kermanshahi (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for Dissolution of 20 Marriage in Los Angeles County Superior Court on August 16, 2017. Notice of 21 Removal (“Removal”) and Attached Petition (“Pet.”), Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner requests 22 dissolution of her marriage with Respondent Michael Jame Addineh (“Respondent”). 23 Pet. at 1. Respondent filed a Notice of Removal on February 13, 2020 invoking this 24 Court’s diversity jurisdiction. Removal at 1-9; see Dkt. No. 1-1 at 1. Respondent 25 also filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 3. 26 /// 27 //// 28 1 II. 2 DISCUSSION 3 Federal courts are courts of …