Rossana Figuerola v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSSANA FIGUEROLA, ) Case No. CV 19-7491 FMO (MAAx) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER Re: MOTION TO REMAND ) 14 NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS ) INSURANCE, et al. ) 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ) 17 Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff's Motion to 18 Remand (Dkt. 13,“Motion”), the court concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the 19 Motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 20 2 (9th Cir. 2001). 21 BACKGROUND 22 On November 28, 2018, plaintiff Rossana Figuerola (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the 23 Santa Barbara Superior Court (“state court”) against Nationwide Agribusiness (“Nationwide”) 24 (“defendant”) and Hometown Insurance Services, Inc. (“Hometown”), and on July 1, 2019, filed 25 a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against the same defendants…