Rossana Figuerola v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20202:19-cv-07491California1,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSSANA FIGUEROLA, ) Case No. CV 19-7491 FMO (MAAx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER Re: MOTION TO REMAND ) NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS ) INSURANCE, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Dkt. 13,“Motion”), the court concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001). BACKGROUND On November 28, 2018, plaintiff Rossana Figuerola (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Santa Barbara Superior Court (“state court”) against Nationwide Agribusiness (“Nationwide”) (“defendant”) and Hometown Insurance Services, Inc. (“Hometown”), and on July 1, 2019, filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against the same defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.