Henry Ramos v. Moog, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY RAMOS, and individual, on behalf of himself and all others Case No. CV 19-10775-AB (SSx) 11 similarly situated,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
12 MOTION FOR REMAND Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14
15 MOOG Inc.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16
17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Henry Ramos (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in Los Angeles County 19 Superior Court on November 21, 2019, alleging that Defendants MOOG Inc. and 20 DOES 1 through 100 (collectively, “Defendants”) violated multiple California labor 21 laws. (Complaint (“Compl.”), Dkt. No. 1-1 at Ex. A.)) On December 20, 2019, 22 Defendants removed the case to this Court. (See Notice of Removal “NOR,” Dkt. No. 23 1.) On January 17, 2020, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for Remand. (“Motion,” 24 Dkt. No. 10.) Defendants filed an Opposition (“Opp’n,” Dkt. No. 11), and Plaintiff 25 filed a Reply. (“Reply,” Dkt. No. 12.) Finding this matter appropriate for resolution 26 without oral argument, the Court vacated the hearing set for…