Henry Ramos v. Moog, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20202:19-cv-10775California2,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HENRY RAMOS, and individual, on behalf of himself and all others Case No. CV 19-10775-AB (SSx) similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR REMAND Plaintiffs, 13 v.

MOOG Inc.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants. Plaintiff Henry Ramos (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court on November 21, 2019, alleging that Defendants MOOG Inc. and DOES 1 through 100 (collectively, “Defendants”) violated multiple California labor laws. (Complaint (“Compl.”), Dkt. No. 1-1 at Ex. A.)) On December 20, 2019, Defendants removed the case to this Court. (See Notice of Removal “NOR,” Dkt. No. 1.) On January 17, 2020, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for Remand. (“Motion,” Dkt. No. 10.) Defendants filed an Opposition (“Opp’n,” Dkt. No. 11), and Plaintiff filed a Reply. (“Reply,” Dkt. No. 12.) Finding this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument, the Court vacated the hearing set for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.