Ellsworth L. Harrell v. Damion Pelonis

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20205:20-cv-00198California3,045 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 10 ELLSWORTH L. HARRELL, Case No. EDCV 20-198-AB (KK) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

13 DAMION PELONIS, ET AL.,

14 Defendant(s).

15 16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Ellsworth L. Harrell (“Harrell” or “Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and 20 in forma pauperis, filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) 21 alleging various violations of his civil rights. For the reasons discussed below, the 22 Court dismisses the Complaint with leave to amend. 23 II. 24 ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT 25 On January 29, 2020, Harrell filed a Complaint against San Bernardino County 26 District Attorneys Damion Pelonis and Thomas Perkins, San Bernardino County 27 Public Defender Andrew Mul, and San Bernardino County Sheriff Detective Patton 1 (“Defendants”) in their individual and official capacities. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 2 1. 3 According…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.