Tory Eanes v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20205:17-cv-01626California1,749 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9

10 TOREY E.,1 Case No. EDCV 17-1626-KK

11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42

13 U.S.C. § 406(B) ANDREW SAUL,2 Commissioner of 14 Social Security,

15 Defendant.

16 17 18 I. 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiff Torey E. (“Plaintiff”)’s counsel, Cyrus Safa of the Law Offices of 21 Lawrence D. Rohlfing (“Counsel”), filed a Motion for Attorney Fees (“Motion”) 22 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (“Section 406(b)”). The Motion seeks an award of 23 $7,000.00 for representing Plaintiff in an action to obtain disability insurance benefits. 24 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States 25

26 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case 27 Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 Magistrate Judge,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.