Vaporstream Inc v. Snap Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20202:17-cv-00220California9,110 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VAPORSTREAM, INC., Case No.: 2:17-cv-00220-MLH (KSx)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER:

13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND 14 SNAP INC. d/b/a/ Snapchat, Inc.,

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

15 Defendant. MOTIONS IN LIMINE; AND

16 [Doc. No. 247.] 17 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND 18

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

19 MOTIONS IN LIMINE

20 [Doc. No. 238, 240, 244, 245, 246.] 21 (3) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ 22

JOINT MOTION REGARDING THE

23 PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE AT

TRIAL REGARDING

24

VAPORSTREAM PRODUCTS

25 [Doc. No. 283.] 26

27 28 1 On January 29, 2020, the parties filed their respective motions in limine. (Doc. Nos. 2 238, 240, 244, 245, 246, 247.) On February 6 and 12, 2020, the parties filed their respective 3 oppositions to the motions in limine. (Doc. Nos. 258, 262, 263, 264, 267, 270.) On 4 February 19, 2020, the parties filed their respective replies. (Doc. Nos. 276, 277, 278, 279, 5 280, 281.) On February 24,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.