Vaporstream Inc v. Snap Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20202:17-cv-00220California9,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VAPORSTREAM, INC., Case No.: 2:17-cv-00220-MLH (KSx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND SNAP INC. d/b/a/ Snapchat, Inc.,

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

Defendant. MOTIONS IN LIMINE; AND

16 [Doc. No. 247.] 17 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTIONS IN LIMINE

20 [Doc. No. 238, 240, 244, 245, 246.] 21 (3) GRANTING THE PARTIES’

JOINT MOTION REGARDING THE

PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE AT

TRIAL REGARDING

VAPORSTREAM PRODUCTS

25 [Doc. No. 283.]

27 28 On January 29, 2020, the parties filed their respective motions in limine. (Doc. Nos. 238, 240, 244, 245, 246, 247.) On February 6 and 12, 2020, the parties filed their respective oppositions to the motions in limine. (Doc. Nos. 258, 262, 263, 264, 267, 270.) On February 19, 2020, the parties filed their respective replies. (Doc. Nos. 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281.) On February 24,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.