Andrew C. Brewer v. Stu Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20202:20-cv-00035California1,397 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:20-cv-00035-FMO-MAA Date: March 3, 2020 Title: Andrew C. Brewer v. Stu Sherman

Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

Erica Valencia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Second Order to Show Cause Why the Petition Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Exhaust

On December 19, 2019, Petitioner Andrew C. Brewer, acting pro se, executed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (“Petition,” ECF No. 1.) The Petition alleges two grounds for relief: (1) “Petitioner received unauthorized sentence from plea deal,” and (2) “Petitioner received 5 enhancements from an unauthorized plea[] deal.” (Id. at 5.) Observing that the Petition appeared to be wholly unexhausted, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the Court should not recommend dismissal for failure to exhaust his claims in state court. (“First OSC,” ECF No. 6.) The Court ordered Petitioner to respond to the First OSC in writing by no later than February…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.