ITN Flix, LLC v. Gloria Hinojosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20202:14-cv-08797California3,496 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 Case No.: 2:14-CV-08797-ODW (AGRx) 11 ITN FLIX, LLC, et al.,

12 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 14 GLORIA HINOJOSA, et al., ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS [143] 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Following the Court’s Order Granting, In Part, Defendants Robert Rodriguez, 19 Machete Kills, LLC, El Chingon, Inc., Troublemaker Studios, L.P., and Quick Draw 20 Productions, LLC’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Special Motion to Strike Pursuant to 21 California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute (“Anti-SLAPP Order,” ECF No. 136), Defendants 22 moved to recover their attorneys’ fees and costs (Mot. for Att’y’s Fees (“Mot.”), ECF 23 No. 143.) Defendants seek an award of $341,778.19 in attorneys’ fees and $1595.54 24 in costs as the prevailing party under California Code of Civil Procedure section 25 425.16. (Mot. 1.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and 26 DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion.1 27

28 1 After considering the papers filed in connection with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.