Darrell Huggins v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20202:20-cv-01623California1,209 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:20-cv-01623-CJC-MAA Date: March 4, 2020 Title: Darrell Huggins v. Kelly Santoro

Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

Erica Valencia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Why the Petition Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Exhaust

On February 18, 2020, Petitioner Darrell T. Huggins, acting pro se, initiated an action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. (“Petition,” ECF No. 1.) The Petition alleges one ground for federal habeas relief: “Ineffective counsel violation of Constitutional rights Federal property and In Federal program.” (Id. at 6.) Petitioner also states he “wasn’t Miranderize [sic] at the scene or time of crime as accused.” (Id.) On February 19, 2020, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington directed the action to be transferred to this Court, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.